Here is what I saw in the data on the 50 most powerful companies in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) sector: virtually all of them are based in the United States, primarily in California (over 54% of the sample). The total funding for these 50 companies is stratospheric, and their average funding per round is approaching $600 million.
- 1. The Numbers Shock: The Domination of Mega-Rounds
- The American Domination and the Scale Effect
- The Necessity of Giga-Funding
- 2. The Structural Weakness of European Venture Capital
- The Absence of Billion-Class Funds
- The Business Model: SaaS vs. Deep Tech
- 3. The Mistral AI Case: The Exception That Proves the Rule
- A European Champion Requiring a Global Vision
- The Lesson for French Investors
- 4. Strategy for the European System: “Patient Money”
- Deploying Patient Capital
- Specialization: Industrial and Regulated AI
- 5. Conclusion: From Patrons of Innovation to Engines of Sovereignty
- Outlook 2026: The European Open Source Pivot
- FAQ: AI Funding and European Competitiveness
Frankly, if we look at this market without the blinders of national optimism, it is heartbreaking. This is not merely a lag — it is a wake-up call about our positioning in the “Capital Race” of the 21st century. The billion dollars is no longer a mark of success; it has become the minimum competitiveness threshold for building a sovereign and credible AI infrastructure. Europe, and France in particular, is at a crossroads: either we accept being mere consumers of American models, or we radically change our investment philosophy. This is the difference between a default alive economy and a default dead economy in the most strategic domain of the decade.
1. The Numbers Shock: The Domination of Mega-Rounds
Analysis of the funding rounds of the 50 major AI players reveals an implacable reality: money is concentrated where technological ambition is strongest.
The American Domination and the Scale Effect
In 2020, the American private sector was already investing $23.5 billion in AI, compared to barely $2 billion for Europe (Source: Cour des Comptes – comparison of AI national strategies). This gap is revealing. American companies are not targeting a local market — they are targeting global domination by building Foundation Models that demand massive investments in compute power and engineering talent. This is an infrastructure race, financed by Mega-Rounds that very often exceed one billion dollars.
Ressource recommandée
Executive Discipline System — le template Notion des fondateurs lucides
Un système opérationnel conçu pour structurer la discipline quotidienne,
clarifier les priorités et maintenir une exécution constante dans des contextes
de forte pression.
Pensé pour les fondateurs, dirigeants et profils exécutifs — pas pour la motivation,
mais pour la tenue dans la durée.
| Region | Number of Companies | Total Funding (Bn USD) | Average per Company (M USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 172.34 | 4,923.86 |
| Other (International) | 12 | 8.547 | 711.32 |
| France (raw data) | 1 | 3.18 | 3,178.68 |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 0.59 | 296.30 |
N.B. The inclusion of a single French company in the sample of the 50 most-funded does not change the hierarchy. It confirms that, even though this exception represents a major funding round ($3.18Bn), continental Europe remains structurally underrepresented against the enormity of American capital.
The Necessity of Giga-Funding
Ideas are worthless without execution, but in AI, execution comes at a staggering price. Building a cutting-edge language model (LLM) can cost hundreds of millions within just a few months. Consequently, traditional European funding cycles — Seed and Series A rounds of a few million — are no longer sufficient to create Deep Tech champions. The Billion Dollar is not a goal — it is the mandatory entry stake to compete in the tournament of giants.
2. The Structural Weakness of European Venture Capital
The fault is not to be found in the DNA of our founders — globally recognized as it is — but in our own funding architecture. The compiler is the problem, not the code.
The Absence of Billion-Class Funds
The central sticking point is the lack of Mega Venture Capital funds comparable to an Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) or Sequoia in the United States. These funds are the only ones capable of providing the scale needed for Mega-Rounds.
| Investor | Number of Investments (Top 50 AI) |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA | 19 |
| Andreessen Horowitz | 12 |
| General Catalyst | 8 |
| New Enterprise Associates | 7 |
| Accel | 7 |
N.B. This ranking demonstrates that the AI race is driven by computing power (NVIDIA) and Silicon Valley venture capital, underscoring the need for a skills transfer toward European VC to identify and fund these champions.
The Business Model: SaaS vs. Deep Tech
The SaaS model was the myth of “hyper-growth at any cost”: a fast return, little capital. Generative AI is the antithesis. Historically, European VC has focused on low capital-intensity SaaS (Software as a Service) solutions. Yet AI is Deep Tech — which is by definition capital-intensive (requiring GPUs, massive datasets, and very long-cycle R&D). Investing in Deep Tech demands a risk tolerance and time horizon far longer than what most continental VCs have been conditioned to accept.
3. The Mistral AI Case: The Exception That Proves the Rule
I’ll admit it: as an entrepreneur, it is easy to slide into sterile defeatism when looking at these figures — but the Mistral AI case shows that the DNA is there. Europe has demonstrated it can produce champions, but their journey underscores the fragility of the ecosystem.
A European Champion Requiring a Global Vision
The Mistral AI case is the archetype of spectacular success that validates the French Tech’s potential in AI. In September 2025, the French startup raised €1.7 billion, valuing it at €11.7 billion (Source: Bpifrance / Mistral AI press release). This amount is not merely a record — it is proof that a top-tier French team (from the best schools and labs in the world) can convince global investors (including Andreessen Horowitz and Nvidia) to bet a colossal sum.
The Lesson for French Investors
The Mistral AI operation is a stress test for local investors. The challenge is no longer just to participate at the seed stage, but to follow through aggressively — to prevent intellectual property and strategic decision-making from tilting entirely toward American funds, even if those funds are necessary to reach such amounts. For L. Lumen, the message is clear: the French VC community should not merely celebrate the success — it must ask itself: are we equipped to lead this type of fundraise without being predominantly dependent on foreign money?
4. Strategy for the European System: “Patient Money”
To close the gap, strategy must focus on injecting patient capital and on specialization — far from the “quick exit” approach.
Chez les athlètes de haut niveau, la discipline n’est pas une question de motivation. C’est un système : des routines, des séquences, un cadre auquel on revient quand la pression monte et que le chaos s’installe.
L’Executive Discipline System applique cette logique au quotidien des fondateurs et dirigeants : structurer l’exécution, maintenir la clarté mentale, et continuer à avancer même après un “match perdu”.
Voir le système →Deploying Patient Capital
Generative AI is a long-term investment, a bet on the decade — not on the three-year cycle. This is where the role of European institutional investors — pension funds, insurance companies, public banks (such as the EIB and Bpifrance) — becomes critical. They are the custodians of what Paul Graham would call “Patient Money”: money that can wait 7 to 10 years to see a massive return. Initiatives like the EIC Fund (European Innovation Council), which has already signed over one billion euros in investment agreements for Deep Tech (Source: EIC Fund – European Innovation Council), are steps in the right direction — but they must be multiplied.
Specialization: Industrial and Regulated AI
Let’s be clear: we cannot compete on funding volume on every front. Europe should specialize and use its regulatory head start (with the AI Act leading the charge) to create dominant niches.
Industrial AI: Europe possesses a powerful manufacturing industry (automotive, aeronautics, luxury goods). Applying AI to optimize these value chains presents a gigantic market that is less dependent on mass-market LLMs.
Trustworthy AI: By making Ethics by Design a competitive advantage, we create AI products natively compatible with strict regulations (GDPR, AI Act). These solutions will become a unique export product.
5. Conclusion: From Patrons of Innovation to Engines of Sovereignty
The picture is bleak if we only look at the past. But the analysis by MagStartup and L. Lumen shows that the future is a choice: to abandon conservative VC in favor of an approach that makes AI investment a matter of economic sovereignty.
French and European investors must undergo a philosophical shift: stop being mere patrons of innovation and become genuine engines of technological sovereignty. This means creating and supporting billion-class funds dedicated to Deep Tech, and demanding that institutional capital commit to the long term. The AI market is a complex and disordered spaghetti code — but it is only by investing massively and deliberately that we will be able to write its future, instead of merely decoding it.
Outlook 2026: The European Open Source Pivot
One of Europe’s competitive advantages lies in its early embrace of Open Source. Players like Mistral AI and Germany’s Aleph Alpha, as well as the French platform Hugging Face, demonstrate that value is not only in the proprietary model, but in the community ecosystem and transparency. This Open Source path is Europe’s best strategy for reducing the upfront cost of R&D and accelerating innovation without systematically depending on American billions. The future of European AI will most likely be open, trustworthy, and regulated.
FAQ: AI Funding and European Competitiveness
Q1: What is a “Mega-Round” and why is it essential for European AI?
A Mega-Round is a funding round reaching or exceeding $100 million — often well beyond (several billion). It is essential in AI because foundation models and computing infrastructure (GPUs, data centers) are extremely expensive. Without these massive rounds, European startups cannot acquire the compute power or the talent needed to compete with American models like OpenAI or Anthropic.
Q2: What is “Patient Money” and what role does it play in Deep Tech?
Patient Money refers to capital (often from pension or insurance funds) invested with a long time horizon (7 to 10 years or more). Unlike traditional VC that targets a quick return, Patient Money is crucial for Deep Tech and AI, because these disruptive technologies require an extended R&D phase before generating significant revenues.
Q3: How can Europe use the AI Act as a competitive advantage?
The AI Act compels companies to create AI systems that comply with strict standards of transparency, ethics, and risk management. Europe can transform this constraint into a competitive advantage by developing Responsible AI (“Trustworthy AI”) and AI Compliance solutions. These solutions — which integrate trust by design — can become unique export products, as companies worldwide will need regulated models to operate on the European market.
Discover our dossiers on fundraising.
